Johannes vermeer cause of death
Johannes Vermeer
Dutch painter (–)
"Vermeer" redirects here. For other uses, see Vermeer (disambiguation).
Johannes Vermeer (vər-MEER, vər-MAIR, Dutch:[joːˈɦɑnəsfərˈmeːr]; see below; also known as Jan Vermeer; October – 15 December ) was a Dutch painter who specialized in domestic interior scenes of middle-class life.
He is considered one of the greatest painters of the Dutch Golden Age. During his lifetime, he was a moderately successful provincial genre painter, recognized in Delft and The Hague. He produced relatively few paintings, primarily earning his living as an art dealer. He was not wealthy; at his death, his wife was left in debt.[3]
Vermeer worked slowly and with great care, and frequently used very expensive pigments.
He is particularly renowned for making masterful use of light in his work.[4] "Almost all his paintings", Hans Koningsberger wrote, "are apparently set in two smallish rooms in his house in Delft; they show the same furniture and decorations in various arrangements and they often portray the same people, mostly women."[5]
The modest celebrity he enjoyed during his life gave way to obscurity after his death.
He was barely mentioned in Arnold Houbraken's major source book on 17th-century Dutch painting (Grand Theatre of Dutch Painters and Women Artists, published ) and, as a result, was omitted from subsequent surveys of Dutch art for nearly two centuries.[6][a] In the 19th century, Vermeer was rediscovered by Gustav Friedrich Waagen and Théophile Thoré-Bürger, who published an essay attributing 66 pictures to him, although only 34 paintings are universally attributed to him today.[2] Since that time, Vermeer's reputation has grown enormously.
Pronunciation of name
In Dutch, Vermeer is pronounced [vərˈmeːr], and Johannes Vermeer as [joːˈɦɑnəsVərˈmeːr], with /v/assimilating to the preceding voiceless /s/ as [f]. The usual English pronunciation is vər-MEER, with vur-MEER, with a long first vowel, occurring in the UK.[8][9][10]vər-MAIR is also documented.[8][9][11][12] Another pronunciation, vair-MEER, is attested from the UK.[13]
Life
Relatively little was known about Vermeer's life until recently.[14] He seems to have been devoted exclusively to his art, living out his life in the city of Delft.
Until the 19th century, the only sources of information were a few registers, official documents, and comments by other artists; for this reason, Thoré-Bürger named him "The Sphinx of Delft".[15]John Michael Montias added details on the family from the city archives of Delft in his Artists and Artisans in Delft: A Socio-Economic Study of the Seventeenth Century ().
Youth and heritage
Johannes Vermeer was baptized within the Reformed Church on 31 October [16][17][b] His mother, Digna Baltens (c.–),[21][c] was from Antwerp.[19] Digna's father, Balthasar Geerts, or Gerrits (born in Antwerp in or around ), led an enterprising life in metalworking, and was arrested for counterfeiting.[19] Vermeer's father, named Reijnier Janszoon, was a middle-class worker of silk or caffa (a mixture of silk and cotton or wool).[d] He was the son of Jan Reyersz and Cornelia (Neeltge) Goris.[e] As an apprentice in Amsterdam, Reijnier lived on fashionable Sint Antoniesbreestraat, a street with many resident painters at the time.
In , Reijnier married Digna. The couple moved to Delft and had a daughter named Gertruy who was baptized in [f] In , Reijnier was involved in a fight with a soldier named Willem van Bylandt who died from his wounds five months later. Around this time, Reijnier began dealing in paintings. In , he leased an inn, which he called "The Flying Fox".
In , he lived on Voldersgracht 25 or In , he bought a larger inn on the market square, named after the Flemish town "Mechelen". The acquisition of the inn constituted a considerable financial burden. When Reijnier died in October , Vermeer took over the operation of the family's art business.
Marriage and family
In April , Johannes Reijniersz Vermeer married a Catholic woman, Catharina Bolnes (Bolenes).[27] The blessing took place in the quiet nearby village of Schipluiden.[28] Vermeer's new mother-in-law, Maria Thins, was initially opposed to the marriage as she was significantly wealthier than he, and it was probably she who insisted that Vermeer convert to Catholicism before the marriage on 5 April.[g] The fact that Vermeer's father was in considerable debt also did not help in discussions on the marriage.
Leonaert Bramer, who was Catholic himself, put in a good word for Vermeer and it was this that led Maria to drop her oppositions.[28] According to art historian Walter Liedtke, Vermeer's conversion seems to have been made with conviction.[27] His painting The Allegory of Faith,[29] made between and , placed less emphasis on the artists' usual naturalistic concerns and more on symbolic religious applications, including the sacrament of the Eucharist.
Vermeer painter biography pdf Upon closer inspection, however, it is possible to make out the dots, flecks, and smudges that make up the tonal difference and details of the image. On the contrary, the calm that Vermeer was known to capture in paint reflects a world that he, himself, perhaps wished to inhabit. It is unclear where and with whom Vermeer apprenticed as a painter. The woman is looking down at her open right palm, which will shortly receive the coin that the man in red is giving her.Walter Liedtke, in Dutch Paintings in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, suggests that it was made for a learned and devout Catholic patron, perhaps for his schuilkerk, or "hidden church". At some point, the couple moved in with Catharina's mother, who lived in a rather spacious house at Oude Langendijk, almost next to a hidden Jesuit church.[h] There Vermeer lived for the rest of his life, producing paintings in the front room on the second floor.
His wife gave birth to 15 children, four of whom were buried before being baptized but were registered as "child of Johan Vermeer". The names of 10 of Vermeer's children are known from wills written by relatives: Maertge, Elisabeth, Cornelia, Aleydis, Beatrix, Johannes, Gertruyd, Franciscus, Catharina, and Ignatius. Most of these names are those of saints; the youngest (Ignatius) was likely named after the Ignatius of Loyola.[i][j]
Career
It is unclear where and with whom Vermeer apprenticed as a painter.
There is some speculation that Carel Fabritius may have been his teacher, based upon a controversial interpretation of a text written in by printer Arnold Bon. Art historians have found no hard evidence to support this. Local authority Leonaert Bramer acted as a friend, but his style of painting is rather different from Vermeer's.[34] Liedtke suggests that Vermeer taught himself using information from one of his father's connections.
Some scholars think that Vermeer was trained under Catholic painter Abraham Bloemaert. Vermeer's style is similar to that of some of the Utrecht Caravaggists, whose works are depicted as paintings-within-paintings in the backgrounds of several of his compositions.[k]
On 29 December , Vermeer became a member of the Guild of Saint Luke, a trade association for painters.
The guild's records make clear that Vermeer did not pay the usual admission fee. It was a year of plague, war, and economic crisis; Vermeer was not alone in experiencing difficult financial circumstances. In , a terrible explosion, known as the Delft Thunderclap, occurred at a gunpowder store and destroyed a large section of the city.[36]Pieter van Ruijven and his wife, Maria de Knuijt, were Vermeer's patrons for the better part of the artist's career.
In , Maria de Knuijt was identified by the curators of the exhibition of Vermeer's works at the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam as the main patron because of her long-standing and supportive relationship with the artist.[37] It seems that Vermeer turned for inspiration to the art of the fijnschilders from Leiden.
Vermeer was responding to the market of Gerard Dou's paintings, who sold his paintings for exorbitant prices. Dou may have influenced Pieter de Hooch and Gabriel Metsu too. Vermeer also charged higher than average prices for his work, most of which were purchased by an unknown collector.[38]
The influence of Johannes Vermeer on Metsu is unmistakable: the light from the left, the marble floor.[40][41][42] (Adriaan Waiboer, however, suggests that Metsu requires more emotional involvement of the viewer.) Vermeer probably competed also with Nicolaes Maes, who produced genre works in a similar style.
In , Vermeer was elected head of the guild and was reelected in , , and , evidence that he (like Bramer) was considered an established craftsman among his peers. Vermeer worked slowly, probably producing three paintings a year on order. Balthasar de Monconys visited him in to see some of his work, but Vermeer had no paintings to show.
The diplomat and the two French clergymen who accompanied him were sent to Hendrick van Buyten, a baker who had a couple of Vermeer's paintings as collateral.
In , Gerrit van Uylenburgh organized the auction of Gerrit Reynst's collection and offered 13 paintings and some sculptures to Frederick William, Elector of Brandenburg. Frederick accused them of being counterfeits and sent 12 back on the advice of Hendrick Fromantiou.
Van Uylenburg then organized a counter-assessment, asking a total of 35 painters to pronounce on their authenticity, including Jan Lievens, Melchior de Hondecoeter, Gerbrand van den Eeckhout, and Johannes Vermeer.
Wars and death
In , a severe economic downturn known as the Rampjaar struck the Dutch Republic, after French troops led by Louis XIV invaded the country from the south during the Franco-Dutch War.
At the same time, troops from Münster and Cologne invaded the country from the east, causing more destruction. Many people panicked; courts, theaters, shops and schools were closed. Vermeer's sale of a painting[clarify] that year was his last.[28] Five years passed before circumstances improved.
In , Vermeer was listed as a member of the civic guards.[44] In the summer of , Vermeer borrowed 1, guilders in Amsterdam from Jacob Romboutsz (grandfather of Hendrick Sorgh), an Amsterdam silk trader, using his mother-in-law's property as a surety.[46]
On 15 December , Vermeer died after a short illness.
He was 43 years old. He was buried in the Protestant Old Church on 15 December [l][m] In a petition to her creditors, Catharina Bolnes attributed her husband's death to the stress of financial pressures, and described his death as follows:
during the ruinous war with France he not only was unable to sell any of his art but also, to his great detriment, was left sitting with the paintings of other masters that he was dealing in.
As a result and owing to the great burden of his children having no means of his own, he lapsed into such decay and decadence, which he had so taken to heart that, as if he had fallen into a frenzy, in a day and a half he went from being healthy to being dead.[47]
Catharina describes how the collapse of the art market had damaged Vermeer's business as both a painter and an art dealer.
She had to raise 11 children and therefore asked the High Court to relieve her of debts owed to Vermeer's creditors. Pioneering Dutch microscopistAntonie van Leeuwenhoek, who worked for the city council as a surveyor, was appointed trustee. The house had eight rooms on the first floor, the contents of which were listed in an inventory taken a few months after Vermeer's death.[49] In his studio, there were two chairs, two painter's easels, three palettes, 10 canvases, a desk, an oak pull table, a small wooden cupboard with drawers, and "rummage not worthy being itemized".
Nineteen of Vermeer's paintings were bequeathed to Catharina and her mother. The widow sold two more paintings to Hendrick van Buyten to pay off a substantial debt.
Vermeer had been a respected artist in Delft, but he was almost unknown outside his hometown. A local patron named Pieter van Ruijven had purchased much of his output, which kept Vermeer afloat financially but reduced the possibility of his fame spreading.[n] Several factors contributed to his limited body of work.
Vermeer never had any pupils, though one scholar has suggested that Vermeer taught his eldest daughter Maria to paint.[52] Additionally, his family obligations with so many children may have taken up much of his time, as would acting as both an art dealer and inn-keeper in running the family businesses.
His time spent serving as head of the guild and his extraordinary precision as a painter may have also limited his output.
Style
Vermeer may have first executed his paintings tonally like most painters of his time, using either monochrome shades of grey ("grisaille") or a limited palette of browns and greys ("dead coloring"), over which he would apply more saturated colors (reds, yellows, and blues) in the form of transparent glazes.
No drawings have been positively attributed to Vermeer, and his paintings offer few clues to preparatory methods.
There is no other 17th-century artist who employed the exorbitantly expensive pigment ultramarine (derived from natural lapis lazuli) either so lavishly or so early in his career. Vermeer used this pigment in not just elements that are naturally of this colour; he also used it early in a work, beneath subsequent earth colours such as umber and ochre, to subtly tint their shade.[53] This working method most probably was inspired by Vermeer's understanding of Leonardo's observations that the surface of every object partakes of the colour of the adjacent object.[54]
An example of Vermeer using ultramarine as an underpaint is in The Girl with the Wine Glass.
The shadows of the red satin dress are underpainted in natural ultramarine, and, owing to this underlying blue paint layer, the red lake and vermilion mixture applied over it acquires a slightly purple, cool and crisp appearance.
Even after Vermeer's evident financial breakdown following the so-called rampjaar (year of disaster) in , he continued to employ natural ultramarine generously, such as in Lady Seated at a Virginal.
This could suggest that Vermeer was supplied with materials by a collector and would coincide with John Michael Montias' theory that Pieter van Ruijven was Vermeer's patron.
Vermeer's works are largely genre pieces and portraits, with the exception of two cityscapes and two allegories. His subjects offer a cross-section of seventeenth-century Dutch society, ranging from the portrayal of a simple milkmaid at work, to the luxury and splendour of rich notables and merchantmen in their roomy houses.
Besides these subjects, religious, poetical, musical, and scientific comments can also be found in his work.[citation needed]
Painting materials
One aspect of his meticulous painting technique was Vermeer's choice of pigments. He is best known for his frequent use of the very expensive ultramarine (The Milkmaid) and also lead-tin-yellow (A Lady Writing a Letter), madder lake (Christ in the House of Martha and Mary), and vermilion.
He also painted with ochres, bone black and azurite.[57] The claim that he used Indian yellow in Woman Holding a Balance has been disproven by pigment analysis.[59]
In Vermeer's oeuvre, only about 20 pigments have been detected. Of these, seven principal pigments that Vermeer commonly employed are lead white, yellow ochre, vermilion, madder lake, green earth, raw umber, and ivory or bone black.[60]
Theories of mechanical aid
Vermeer's painting techniques have long been a source of debate, given their almost photorealistic attention to detail, despite Vermeer's having had no formal training and despite only limited evidence that Vermeer had created any preparatory sketches or traces for his paintings.[61]
In , British artist David Hockney published the book Secret Knowledge: Rediscovering the Lost Techniques of the Old Masters, in which he argued that Vermeer (among other Renaissance and Baroque artists including Hans Holbein and Diego Velázquez) used optics to achieve precise positioning in their compositions, and specifically some combination of curved mirrors, camera obscura, and camera lucida.
This became known as the Hockney–Falco thesis, named after Hockney and Charles M. Falco, another proponent of the theory.
Philip Steadman published the book Vermeer's Camera: Uncovering the Truth behind the Masterpieces in , in which Steadman specifically claimed that Vermeer had used a camera obscura to create his paintings.
Steadman noted that many of Vermeer's paintings had been painted in the same room, and he found six of Vermeer's paintings that would be precisely the right size if they had been painted from inside a camera obscura in the room's back wall.[62]
Supporters of these theories have pointed to evidence in some of Vermeer's paintings, such as the often-discussed sparkling pearly highlights in Vermeer's paintings, which they argue are the result of the primitive lens of a camera obscura producing halation.
It was also postulated that a camera obscura was the mechanical cause of the "exaggerated" perspective seen in The Music Lesson (London, Royal Collection).[63]
In , American entrepreneur and inventor Tim Jenison developed the theory that Vermeer had used a camera obscura along with a "comparator mirror", which is similar in concept to a camera lucida but much simpler and makes it easy to match colour values.
Jenison later modified the theory to simply involve a concave mirror and a comparator mirror. He spent the next five years testing his theory by re-creating The Music Lesson himself using these tools, a process captured in the documentary film Tim's Vermeer.[64]
Several points were brought out by Jenison in support of this technique.
First was Vermeer's hyper-accurate rendition of light falloff along the wall.
Neurobiologist Colin Blakemore, in an interview with Jenison, notes that human vision cannot process information about the absolute brightness of a scene.[65] Another was the addition of several highlights and outlines consistent with matching the effects of chromatic aberration, particularly noticeable in primitive optics.
Last, and perhaps most telling, is a noticeable curvature in the original painting's rendition of the scrollwork on the virginal. This effect matched Jenison's technique precisely, caused by exactly duplicating the view as seen from a curved mirror.
This theory remains disputed. There is no historical evidence regarding Vermeer's interest in optics, and the detailed inventory of the artist's belongings drawn up after his death includes no camera obscura or any similar device.[66][49][o] However, Vermeer was in close connection with pioneer lens maker Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, who was his executor after death.[68]
Works
See also: List of paintings by Johannes Vermeer and Category:Johannes Vermeer
It is believed Vermeer produced a total of fewer than 50 paintings, of which 34 have survived.[69] Only three Vermeer paintings were dated by the artist: The Procuress (; Gemäldegalerie, Dresden); The Astronomer (; Musée du Louvre, Paris); and The Geographer (; Städelsches Kunstinstitut, Frankfurt).
Vermeer's mother-in-law, Maria Thins, owned Dirck van Baburen's oil on canvas The Procuress (or a copy of it), which appears in the background of two of Vermeer's paintings. The same subject was also painted by Vermeer. Almost all of Vermeer's paintings are of contemporary subjects in a smaller format, with a cooler palette dominated by blues, yellows, and r painted multiple artworks portraying a pure profile like the painting Woman with a Pearl Necklace, which was uncommon in Dutch art at the time.[70] Practically all of his surviving works belong to this period, usually domestic interiors with one or two figures lit by a window on the left.[71] They are characterized by a sense of compositional balance and spatial order, unified by a pearly light.
Mundane domestic or recreational activities are imbued with a poetic timelessness (e.g., Girl Reading a Letter at an Open Window, Dresden, Gemäldegalerie). Vermeer's two townscapes have also been attributed to this period: View of Delft (The Hague, Mauritshuis) and The Little Street (Amsterdam, Rijksmuseum).
A few of his paintings show a certain hardening of manner and are generally thought to represent his late works.
From this period come The Allegory of Faith (c. ; Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York) and The Love Letter (c. ; Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam).
Legacy
Originally, Vermeer's works were largely overlooked by art historians for two centuries after his death. A select number of connoisseurs in the Netherlands did appreciate his work, yet even so, many of his works were attributed to then better-known artists such as Metsu or Mieris.
The Delft master's modern rediscovery began about , when German museum director Gustav Waagen saw The Art of Painting in the Czernin gallery in Vienna and recognized the work as a Vermeer, though it was attributed to Pieter de Hooch at that time. Research by Théophile Thoré-Bürger culminated in the publication of his catalogue raisonné of Vermeer's works in the Gazette des Beaux-Arts in Thoré-Bürger's catalogue drew international attention to Vermeer[74] and listed more than 70 works by him, including many that Thoré-Bürger regarded as uncertain.
Upon the rediscovery of Vermeer's work, several prominent Dutch artists modelled their style on his work, including Simon Duiker.
Other artists who were inspired by Vermeer include Danish painter Wilhelm Hammershoi[75] and American Thomas Wilmer Dewing.[76] In the 20th century, Vermeer's admirers included Salvador Dalí, who painted his own version of The Lacemaker (on commission from collector Robert Lehman) and pitted large copies of the original against a rhinoceros in some surrealist experiments.
Vermeer paintings: Catharina describes how the collapse of the art market had damaged Vermeer's business as both a painter and an art dealer. Archived from the original on 13 September Young Woman with a Lute Johannes Vermeer. Vermeer's legacy is also marked by his slow and meticulous working style, which often resulted in paintings that were highly detailed and richly colored.
Dali also celebrated the master in The Ghost of Vermeer of Delft Which Can Be Used As a Table,
Han van Meegeren was a 20th-century Dutch painter who worked in the classical tradition. He became a master forger, motivated by a blend of aesthetic and financial reasons, creating and selling many new "Vermeers" before turning himself in for forgery to avoid being charged with capital treason for collaboration with the Nazis, specifically in selling what had been believed to be original artwork to the Nazis.[77]
On the evening of 23 September , a year-old hotel waiter, Mario Pierre Roymans, stole Vermeer's Love Letter from the Fine Arts Palace in Brussels, where it was on loan from the Rijksmuseum for the exhibition Rembrandt and his Age.[78]
To mark the 26th anniversary of the opening of an exhibition at Washington, DC's National Gallery of Art featuring Vermeer's work, Google honored Vermeer with a Google Doodle on 12 November [79]
A exhibition at the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam featured 28 of Vermeer's works, the most ever shown together.[80] More than , people visited the exhibition, making it the museum's most visited exhibition.[81] Coinciding with the exhibition, the documentary film Close to Vermeer was released the same year.
The film followed curators Gregor J. M. Weber and Pieter Roelofs as they sought loans of Vermeer's artwork from museums around the world.[82] Also released in was another movie about the exhibition at the Rijkmuseum: Vermeer: The Greatest Exhibition. (External links to both movies are below.)
In popular culture
See also: Johannes Vermeer in popular culture
Vermeer's reputation and works have been featured in both literature and in films.
Tracy Chevalier's novel Girl with a Pearl Earring () and the film of the same name present a fictional account of Vermeer's creation of the famous painting and his relationship with the equally fictional model.
Many artists are inspired by the famous painter. For example, culinary photographer Aimee Twigger draws on Vermeer's chiaroscuro for her gustatory journeys through recipes.[83]
Gallery of selected works
The Girl with the Wine Glass (c.
), Herzog Anton Ulrich Museum in Brunswick, Germany
The Music Lesson or A Lady at the Virginals with a Gentleman (c. –), Royal Collection in London
Girl with a Pearl Earring (), considered a Vermeer masterpiece, Mauritshuis in Den Haag
Girl with the Red Hat (c.
–), National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C.
Mistress and Maid (–), Frick Collection in New York City
The Art of Painting or The Allegory of Painting (c. –), Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna
The Astronomer (c.
), Musée du Louvre in Paris
The Geographer (), Städel Museum in Frankfurt am Main
Lady Writing a Letter with her Maid (c. –), National Gallery of Ireland in Dublin, Ireland
The Allegory of Faith (–), Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York
Lady Seated at a Virginal (c.
Johannes vermeer painter Vermeer and the Delft School. The man on the left is dressed in a black beret and a black, possibly silk, doublet with ripped sleeves. The slab denotes the rock of the Catholic Church. Vermeer's sale of a painting [ clarify ] that year was his last.–), National Gallery in London
Notes
- ^Vermeer was largely unknown to the general public, but his reputation was not totally eclipsed after his death: "While it is true that he did not achieve widespread fame until the 19th century, his work had always been valued and admired by well-informed connoisseurs."[7]
- ^Vermeer was baptized as Joannis.[18][16] Jan was the most popular version of the name among Calvinists.
Joannis was a Latinazied form of Jan, which was preferred by Roman Catholics and upper-middle class Protestants.[18][16] However, Vermeer was born into a lower-middle class family.[19][20] Still, according to Montias, it is unlikely that his parents were Catholics "at this time [the time of Vermeer's baptism]," seeing that they "baptized him in the established church."[18] Throughout his life, Vermeer never used the name Jan.
Nevertheless, "most Dutch authors, in the century since his rediscovery, have dubbed him Jan, perhaps unconsciously to bring him closer to the mainstream of Calvinist culture."[18][16]
- ^His mother was born in Antwerp. When she married Vermeer's father in , she claimed to be twenty years old, but she may have "exaggerated her age by a year or so."[22] Digna's parents were married in Antwerp in
- ^His name was Reijnier or Reynier Janszoon, always written in Dutch as Jansz.
or Jansz; this was his patronym. As there was another Reijnier Jansz at that time in Delft, it seemed necessary to use the pseudonym "Vos", meaning Fox. From onward, he had changed his alias to Vermeer.
- ^Neeltge remarried three times, the second time shortly after Jan's death, in October
- ^In Geertruy, Vermeer's only sister, married a frame maker.
She kept on working at the inn helping her parents, serving drinks and making beds.
- ^Catholicism was not a forbidden religion, but tolerated in the Dutch Republic. They were not allowed to build new churches, so services were held in hidden churches (so-called Schuilkerk). Catholics were restrained in their careers, unable to get high-rank jobs in city administration or civic guard.
It was impossible to be elected as a member of the city council; therefore, the Catholics were not represented in the provincial and national assembly.
- ^A Roman Catholic chapel now exists at this spot.
- ^The parish registers of the Delft Catholic church do not exist anymore, so it is impossible to prove but likely that his children were baptized in a hidden church.
- ^The number of children seems inconsistent, but 11 was stated by his widow in a document to get help from the city council.
One child died after this document was written.
- ^Identifiable works include compositions by Utrecht painters Baburen and Everdingen.
- ^He was baptized as Joannis, but buried under the name Jan.[relevant?]
- ^When Catharina Bolnes was buried in , she was registered as the "widow of Johan Vermeer".
- ^Van Ruijven's son-in-law Jacob Dissius owned 21 paintings by Vermeer, listed in his heritage in These paintings were sold in Amsterdam the following year in a much-studied auction, published by Gerard Hoet.
- ^The inventory taken soon after Vermeer's death does not mention a camera obscura, although it does include easels, palettes, canvases, and a possible maulstick.
Gold, silver, jewellery, or musical instruments are not mentioned; it has been suggested that Catharina Bolnes might have removed any valuables from the house to conceal them from her creditors, or pawned the jewels and gold and silver.[67]
References
- ^Boone, Jon.
"The Procuress: Evidence for a Vermeer Self-Portrait". Essential Vermeer. Archived from the original on 3 May Retrieved 13 September
- ^ abJanson, Jonathan. "Complete Vermeer Catalogue & Tracker". Essential Vermeer. Retrieved 16 June
- ^"Jan Vermeer".
The Bulfinch Guide to Art History. Artchive. Retrieved 21 September
- ^Janson, Jonathan (5 February ). "An Interview with Jørgen Wadum". Essential Vermeer. Retrieved 21 September
- ^Koningsberger, Hans (). The World of Vermeer. New York, USA: Time-Life Books.
OCLC
- ^Barker, Emma; etal. (). The Changing Status of the Artist. New Haven: Yale University Press. p. ISBN.
- ^Blankert, Albert (). "Vermeer and his Public". In Blankert, Albert; Montias, John Michael; Aillaud, Gilles (eds.). Vermeer. New York, USA: Overlook. p. ISBN.
- ^ abJones, Daniel ().
Roach, Peter; Setter, Jane; Esling, John (eds.). Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary (18thed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN.
- ^ abWells, John C. (). Longman Pronunciation Dictionary (3rded.). Longman. ISBN.
- ^Upton, Clive; Kretzschmar, William A.
Jr. (). The Routledge Dictionary of Pronunciation for Current English (2nded.). Routledge. ISBN.
- ^"Vermeer". Dictionary. Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 6 August
- ^"Vermeer". The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (5thed.). HarperCollins.
Retrieved 6 August
- ^"Vermeer". Collins English Dictionary. HarperCollins. Retrieved 6 August
- ^Janson, Jonathan. "Vermeer the Man and Painter". Essential Vermeer. Retrieved 10 April
- ^"Vermeer: A View of Delft". The Economist. 1 April Archived from the original on 5 November Retrieved 21 September
- ^ abcdJanso, Jonathan.
"Vermeer's Name". Essential Vermeer. Retrieved 21 September
- ^"Digital Family Tree of the Municipal Records Office of the City of Delft". Beheersraad Digitale Stamboom. Archived from the original on 23 February Retrieved 21 September
- ^ abcdMontias , p.64–65
- ^ abcJanson, Jonathan.
"Vermeer's Life and Art (part one)". Essential Vermeer. Retrieved 27 November
- ^"Johannes Vermeer". The Art Story.Vermeer painter biography wikipedia Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Exhibition catalogue. Liedtke, Walter A. No drawings have been positively attributed to Vermeer, and his paintings offer few clues to preparatory methods.
Retrieved 16 December
- ^Janson, Jonathan. "Vermeer's Family Tree". Essential Vermeer. Retrieved 27 November
- ^Montias , p.17
- ^ abLiedtke, Walter; Plomp, Michiel C.; Rüger, Axel ().Vermeer painter biography From onward, he had changed his alias to Vermeer. The Art Story. Yet his mastery of pigment and light elevated the artist beyond the realm of his contemporaries, providing an inimitable glimpse into the lifestyle of his thriving historical era. Similar Art and Related Pages.
Vermeer and the Delft school: [catalogue in conjunction with the exhibition "Vermeer and the Delft School" held at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, from 8 March to 27 May , and at The National Gallery, London, from 20 June to 16 September ]. New Haven: Yale University Press. p. ISBN.
- ^ abcSchneider, Norbert ().
Vermeer: The Complete Paintings. Taschen. pp.8,
- ^"Johannes Vermeer: Allegory of the Catholic Faith ()". The Met. Metropolitan Museum of Art. 20 July Retrieved 24 July
- ^"Johannes Vermeer: Biography". National Gallery of Art. Retrieved 27 July
- ^Janson, Jonathan.
"Delft in Johannes Vermeer's Time". Essential Vermeer. Retrieved 29 September
- ^Bailey, Martin (7 February ). "Revealed: Vermeer's patron was, in fact, a woman—and she bought half the artist's entire oeuvre". The Art Newspaper. Retrieved 26 April